Barriers and facilitators to smartwatch-based prehabilitation participation among frail surgery patients: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: For older, frail adults, exercise before surgery through prehabilitation (prehab) may hasten return recovery and reduce postoperative complications. We developed a smartwatch-based prehab program (BeFitMe) for older adults that encourages and tracks at-home exercise. The objective of this study was to assess patient perceptions about facilitators and barriers to prehab generally and to using a smartwatch prehab program among older adult thoracic surgery patients to optimize future program implementation. METHODS: We recruited patients, aged ≥50 years who had or were having surgery and were screened for frailty (Fried's Frailty Phenotype) at a thoracic surgery clinic at a single academic institution. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone after obtaining informed consent. Participants were given a description of the BeFitMe program. The interview questions were informed by The Five "Rights" of Clinical Decision-Making framework (Information, Person, Time, Channel, and Format) and sought to identify the factors perceived to influence smartwatch prehab program participation. Interview transcripts were transcribed and independently coded to identify themes in for each of the Five "Rights" domains. RESULTS: A total of 29 interviews were conducted. Participants were 52% men (n = 15), 48% Black (n = 14), and 59% pre-frail (n = 11) or frail (n = 6) with a mean age of 68 ± 9 years. Eleven total themes emerged. Facilitator themes included the importance of providers (right person) clearly explaining the significance of prehab (right information) during the preoperative visit (right time); providing written instructions and exercise prescriptions; and providing a preprogrammed and set-up (right format) Apple Watch (right channel). Barrier themes included pre-existing conditions and disinterest in exercise and/or technology. Participants provided suggestions to overcome the technology barrier, which included individualized training and support on usage and responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the perceived facilitators and barriers to a smartwatch-based prehab program for pre-frail and frail thoracic surgery patients. The future BeFitMe implementation protocol must ensure surgical providers emphasize the beneficial impact of participating in prehab before surgery and provide a written prehab prescription; must include a thorough guide on smartwatch use along with the preprogrammed device to be successful. The findings are relevant to other smartwatch-based interventions for older adults.

Technology-assisted behavioral intervention to encourage prehabilitation in frail older adults undergoing surgery: Development and design of the BeFitMe™ Apple Watch app.

Objective: Increasing the physical activity of frail, older patients before surgery through prehabilitation (prehab) can hasten return to autonomy and reduce complications postoperatively. However, prehab participation is low in the clinical setting. In this study, we re-design an existing prehab smartphone application (BeFitMe™) using a novel standalone Apple Watch platform to increase accessibility and usability for vulnerable patients. Methods: Design Science Research Methodology was used to (1) develop an approach to clinical research using standalone Apple Watches, (2) re-design BeFitMe™ for the Apple Watch platform, and (3) incorporate user feedback into app design. In phase 3, beta and user testers gave feedback via a follow-up phone call. Exercise data was extracted from the watch after testing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize accessibility and usability. Results: BeFitMe™ was redesigned for the Apple Watch with full functionality without requiring patients to have an iPhone or internet connectivity and the ability to passively collect exercise data without patient interaction. Three study staff participated in beta testing over 3 weeks. Six randomly chosen thoracic surgery patients participated in user testing over 12 weeks. Feedback from beta and user testers was addressed with updated software (versions 1.0-1.10), improved interface and notification schemes, and the development of educational materials used during enrollment. The majority of users (5/6, 83%) participated by responding to at least one notification and data was able to be collected for 54/82 (68%) of the days users had the watches. The amount of data collected in BeFitMe™ Watch app increased from 2/11 (16%) days with the first patient tester to 13/13 (100%) days with the final patient tester. Conclusions: The BeFitMe™ Watch app is accessible and usable. The BeFitMe™ Watch app may help older patients, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds with fewer resources, participate in prehab prior to surgery.

Racial differences in phenotypic frailty assessment among general thoracic surgery patients.

Objectives: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery recommends using frailty assessments to identify patients at higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We evaluated what patient factors are associated with frailty in a thoracic surgery patient population. Methods: New patients aged more than 50 years who were evaluated in a thoracic surgery clinic underwent routine frailty screening with a modified Fried's Frailty Phenotype. Differences in demographics and comorbid conditions among frailty status groups were assessed with chi-square and Student t tests. Logistic regressions performed with binomial distribution assessed the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with nonfrail, frail, prefrail, and any frailty (prefrail/frail) status. Results: The study population included 317 patients screened over 19 months. Of patients screened, 198 (62.5%) were frail or prefrail. Frail patients undergoing thoracic surgery were older, were more likely single or never married, had lower median income, and had lower percent predicted diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and forced expiratory volume during 1 second (all P < .05). More non-Hispanic Black patients were frail and prefrail compared with non-Hispanic White patients (P = .003) and were more likely to score at least 1 point on Fried's Frailty Phenotype (adjusted odds ratio, 3.77; P = .02) when controlling for age, sex, number of comorbidities, median income, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, and forced expiratory volume during 1 second. Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to score points for slow gait and low activity (both P < .05). Conclusions: Non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing thoracic surgery are more likely to score as frail or prefrail than non-Hispanic White patients. This disparity stems from differences in activity and gait speed. Frailty tools should be examined for factors contributing to this disparity, including bias.

Comparison of Frailty Measures as Predictors of Outcomes After Orthopedic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To apply the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI) before major elective orthopedic surgery to categorize frailty status and assess associations with postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 70 and older undergoing scheduled orthopedic surgery enrolled in the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) Study (N = 415). MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative evaluation included assessment of frailty using the FP and FI. The weighted kappa statistic was used to determine concordance between the two frailty measures and multivariable modeling to determine associations between each measure and postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) of longer than 5 days, discharge to postacute institutional care (PAC), and 300 day readmission. RESULTS: Frailty was highly prevalent (FP, 35%; FI, 41%). There was moderate concordance between the FP and FI (κ = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.49). When using the FP, being prefrail predicted greater risk of complications (relative risk (RR) = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-2.9) than being robust, and being frail predicted more complications (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.1-2.1), LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.1-8.8), and discharge to PAC (RR = 2.3 95% CI = 1.4-3.7). When using FI, being prefrail predicted LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0-4.8) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.4-2.1), as did being frail (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5; RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4-6.8, respectively). The other outcomes were not significantly associated with frailty status. CONCLUSION: FP and FI predict postoperative outcomes after major elective orthopedic surgery and should be considered for preoperative risk stratification.

Effect of Delirium and Other Major Complications on Outcomes After Elective Surgery in Older Adults.

IMPORTANCE: Major postoperative complications and delirium contribute independently to adverse outcomes and high resource use in patients who undergo major surgery; however, their interrelationship is not well examined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of major postoperative complications and delirium, alone and combined, with adverse outcomes after surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study in 2 large academic medical centers of 566 patients who were 70 years or older without recognized dementia or a history of delirium and underwent elective major orthopedic, vascular, or abdominal surgical procedures with a minimum 3-day hospitalization between June 18, 2010, and August 8, 2013. Data analysis took place from December 13, 2013, through May 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major postoperative complications, defined as life-altering or life-threatening events (Accordion Severity grade 2 or higher), were identified by expert-panel adjudication. Delirium was measured daily with the Confusion Assessment Method and a validated medical record review method. The following 4 subgroups were analyzed: (1) no complications or delirium; (2) complications only; (3) delirium only; and (4) complications and delirium. Adverse outcomes included a length of stay (LOS) of more than 5 days, institutional discharge, and rehospitalization within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: In the 566 participants, the mean (SD) age was 76.7 (5.2) years, 236 (41.7%) were male, and 523 (92.4%) were white. Forty-seven patients (8.3%) developed major complications and 135 (23.9%) developed delirium. Compared with no complications or delirium as the reference group, major complications only contributed to prolonged LOS only (relative risk [RR], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9-4.0); by contrast, delirium only significantly increased all adverse outcomes, including prolonged LOS (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7), institutional discharge (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7), and 30-day readmission (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7). The subgroup with complications and delirium had the highest rates of all adverse outcomes, including prolonged LOS (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.3-4.8), institutional discharge (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5), and 30-day readmission (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.8). Delirium exerted the highest attributable risk at the population level (5.8%; 95% CI, 4.7-6.8) compared with all other adverse events (prolonged LOS, institutional discharge, or readmission). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Major postoperative complications and delirium are separately associated with adverse events and demonstrate a combined effect. Delirium occurs more frequently and has a greater effect at the population level than other major complications.

Cognitive and Physical Demands of Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults: Validation of Expert Panel Ratings.

BACKGROUND: Difficulties with performance of functional activities may result from cognitive and/or physical impairments. To date, there has not been a clear delineation of the physical and cognitive demands of activities of daily living. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the relative physical and cognitive demands required to complete typical functional activities in older adults. DESIGN: Expert panel survey. SETTING: Web-based platform. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven experts from 8 academic medical centers and 300 community-dwelling elderly adults age 70 and older scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery from 2 academic medical centers. METHODS: Sum scores of expert ratings were calculated and then validated against objective data collected from a prospective longitudinal study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Correlation between expert ratings and objective neuropsychologic tests (memory, language, complex attention) and physical measures (gait speed and grip strength) for performance-based tasks. RESULTS: Managing money, self-administering medications, using the telephone, and preparing meals were rated as requiring significantly more cognitive demand, whereas walking and transferring, moderately strenuous activities, and climbing stairs were assessed as more physically demanding. Largely cognitive activities correlated with objective neuropsychologic performance (r = 0.13-0.23, P < .05) and largely physical activities correlated with physical performance (r = 0.15-0.46, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying the degree of cognitive and/or physical demand for completing a specific task adds an additional dimension to standard measures of functional assessment. This additional information may significantly influence decisions about rehabilitation, postacute care needs, treatment plans, and caregiver education.

Anticoagulation management in individuals with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the interventions taken to lower international normalized ratio (INR) in individuals with hip fracture using warfarin before admission for hip fracture surgery in a geriatric fracture center (GFC) and compare outcomes with those of individuals not taking warfarin. DESIGN: Cohort study using retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-affiliated community teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 60 and older admitted to a GFC for surgical repair of a nonpathological, nonperiprosthetic hip fracture between April 2006 and April 2012. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive data collected from a quality improvement registry with additional information for individuals taking warfarin obtained from chart review. RESULTS: Of the 1,080 individuals included in the analysis, 84 (7.8%) were taking warfarin on admission. Participants using warfarin had a higher average Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.8 vs 3.1, P < .001). Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for anticoagulation (83.3%). Average INR before surgery was 1.7 (range 1.2-3.6). Vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, or both were given to 100% of those taking warfarin with an admission INR of 2.0 or greater. There was a trend toward longer time to surgery in those taking warfarin than in those not taking warfarin (28.9 vs 21.7 hours, P = .05). Length of stay was longer for those taking warfarin than those not taking warfarin (4.8 vs 4.2 days, P = .04). Neither time to surgery nor length of stay were significantly different after adjustment for baseline comorbidity. Participants taking warfarin were not found to have any significant differences in thromboembolic event rates, bleeding complications rates, mortality, or 30-day readmission after surgery than those not taking warfarin on admission. CONCLUSION: Active management in a GFC model to reverse anticoagulation before surgery may facilitate earlier surgery without increasing observed complications.

Polypharmacy in the HIV-infected older adult population.

The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among people older than 50 years is increasing. Older HIV-infected patients are particularly at risk for polypharmacy because they often have multiple comorbidities that require pharmacotherapy. Overall, there is not much known with respect to both the impact of aging on medication use in HIV-infected individuals, and the potential for interactions with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and coadministered medications and its clinical consequences. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of polypharmacy with a focus on its impact on the HIV-infected older adult population and to also provide some clinical considerations in this high-risk population.

Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in high-risk patients prior to hip fracture.

PURPOSE: Hip fractures in older adults are common and serious events. Patients who sustain fragility hip fractures are defined as having osteoporosis. Patients with dementia or a history of a prior fragility fracture are at increased risk of a future fracture. This study assesses prefracture osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in high-risk groups. METHODS: A case-control analysis of a database of all patients age ≥60 years admitted for surgical repair of nonpathological, low-impact femur fracture between May 2005 and October 2010 was performed. RESULTS: Of 1070 patients, 511 (47.8%) had dementia and 435 (40.7%) had been diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to admission. Patients with dementia were more likely to have a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to their fracture than those without dementia (43.8% vs 37.7%, P < .05). Twenty-five percent of the total study population had been treated with calcium and vitamin D (Cal+D) prior to admission, and 12% with other osteoporosis medications. There was a trend toward patients with dementia being more likely to have been on Cal+D prior to admission (27.6% vs 22.5%, P = .06), but no difference in treatment with other agents (10.8% vs 13.1%, P = .25). Patients with prior fragility fractures were more likely to be on Cal+D (32.3% vs 25.0%, P < .02); however, there was no difference in the use of other osteoporosis medications (12.3% vs 12%, P = .90). CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of patients that presented with hip fractures were diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to fracture and primary preventative treatment rates were low. Although patients with dementia are more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis, they were not more likely to be treated, despite having a greater risk. Additionally, those with prior fragility fractures are often not on preventative treatment. This may represent a missed opportunity for prevention and room for improvement in order to reduce osteoporotic hip fractures.